Myths and Misconceptions in the Active vs Passive Debate

Founded in 1976, Bankrate has a long track record of helping people make smart financial choices. We’ve maintained this reputation for over four decades by demystifying the financial decision-making process and giving people confidence in which actions to take next. Filter by investment need, ZIP code or view all Financial Advisors. Get the latest insights, analyses and market trends in our newsletter, podcasts and videos. We leverage the full resources of our firm to help individuals, families and institutions reach their financial goals.

active vs passive investing

Our objective is to highlight how each approach can best be used by an investor to achieve his or her long term goals. On the other hand, experience has taught us not to be ideologues in this active versus passive debate. There are four important exceptions to our general rule that, for investors with a long time horizon, passive investing makes the most sense. Other forms of the S&P 500 Index weight the stocks differently, such as using equal weights. Compared with the market cap‑weighted index, this index is more exposed to smaller and less valuable companies, and thus introduces a clear value tilt to a passive investment exposure.

What Is Active Investing?

Our authors can publish views that we may or may not agree with, but they show their work, distinguish facts from opinions, and make sure their analysis is clear and in no way misleading or deceptive. Buy-and-hold investors can defer capital gains taxes until they sell, so they don’t need to ring up much of a tax bill in any given year. The S&P 500 index fund compounded a 7.1% annual gain over the next nine years, beating the average returns of 2.2% by the funds selected by Protégé Partners. Active investing is the management of a portfolio with a “hands-on” approach with constant monitoring by investment professionals.

active vs passive investing

The material has not been reviewed by any regulatory authority in any jurisdiction. Since the index makes all the decisions on which companies to include, you don’t pay for — or benefit from — expert individual stock analysis. Markets are not perfectly efficient, and they probably never will be, but that in itself isn’t a stamp of approval for active management. Managers must be able to capitalize on these inefficiencies and deliver results that consistently are above benchmark.

Related Terms

Portfolio managers use their experience, knowledge, and analysis to make choices about what to buy or sell in the portfolio. For many investors, this could mean buying stocks or funds and holding onto them for years, with the goal of long-term growth. Active investing allows investors to build a portfolio that is customized exactly to their interests, preferences, and passions. It also accounts for personal factors such as risk tolerance as well as goals and return objectives. Active investing may sound like a better approach than passive investing. After all, we’re prone to see active things as more powerful, dynamic and capable.

An active fund manager’s experience can translate into higher returns, but passive investing, even by novice investors, consistently beats all but the top players. The generally low‑cost structure of passive investing has obvious appeal. However, investors who choose an investment purely on this basis must understand that, in doing so, they are guaranteed to underperform the index, year in, year active vs passive investing out. It is true that many active managers also underperform their comparative indices, and at a higher cost. However, skilled active managers can and do regularly beat comparable passive returns. Passive investment strategies will generally incur less of a tax burden than active strategies, and in certain cases (a separate account optimized for tax-loss harvesting), can generate tax assets .

Myths and Misconceptions in the Active vs. Passive Debate

Active investing requires confidence that whoever is managing the portfolio will know exactly the right time to buy or sell. Successful active investment management requires being right more often than wrong. Let’s break it all down in a chart comparing the two approaches for an investor looking to buy a stock mutual fund that’s either active or passive. Research and follow companies closely, and buy and sell stocks based on their view of the future. This is a typical approach for professionals or those who can devote a lot of time to research and trading. Third, consistently accurate forecasting must be based on some combination of superior information and/or a superior model for making sense of it.

For example, if you’re an active US equity investor, your goal may be to achieve better returns than the S&P 500 or Russell 3000. Fees for both active and passive funds have fallen over time, but active funds still cost more. In 2018, the average expense ratio of actively managed equity mutual funds was 0.76%, down from 1.04% in 1997, according to the Investment Company Institute. Contrast that with expense ratios for passive index equity funds, which averaged just 0.08% in 2018, down from 0.27% in 1997. Funds built on the S&P 500 index, which mostly tracks the largest American companies, are among the most popular passive investments. If they buy and hold, investors will earn close to the market’s long-term average return — about 10% annually — meaning they’ll beat nearly all professional investors with little effort and lower cost.

Understanding active and passive investing

So, whether you’re reading an article or a review, you can trust that you’re getting credible and dependable information. At Bankrate we strive to help you make smarter financial decisions. While we adhere to stricteditorial integrity, this post may contain references to products from our partners. In moments of upheaval and transition, the following articles are designed to build understanding about growing private debt and private equity markets. Get instant access to video lessons taught by experienced investment bankers. Learn financial statement modeling, DCF, M&A, LBO, Comps and Excel shortcuts.

  • In order to be effective with this combination, it is important to understand when to use each strategy, and how they may complement one another.
  • The truth is none of these articles address an individual investor’s unique situation.
  • If you invest in index funds, you don’t have to do the research, pick the individual stocks or do any of the other legwork.
  • While there are advantages and disadvantages to both strategies, investors are starting to shift dollars away from active mutual funds to passive mutual funds and passiveexchange-traded funds .
  • These funds pool money from multiple investors to buy the individual stocks, bonds, or securities that make up their market index.

There has been an on-going debate for years between active and passive investment management. Typically, everything you read will defend one side over the other. Of course, this polarizing approach stirs the pot and makes for great articles. The truth is none of these articles address an individual investor’s unique situation. I’m not in the business of telling people that there is only one way to be successful in investing because that is simply not the case.

Active vs Passive Investing – And the Winner Is?

This is because it is more difficult for managers to forecast future earnings or prices in more cyclical markets. As an active fund manager seeks to outperform the market, he or she must thoroughly research the investments available within the fund’s targeted asset class. It’s a labor-intensive process, requiring a deep understanding of financial markets, industries and individual companies. The active fund manager spends a lot of time gathering pertinent information and making the trades he or she believes will result in the highest returns. The manager is paid for the time and effort involved, and that results in higher investment fees.

The Active vs. Passive Debate

Passive investment funds made up of a preset index of stocks or other securities. Additional information about the Adviser is available on the SEC’s website at Fourth, successful active funds usually accept new fund inflows , even though this leads to lower returns . Second, portfolio constraints often mean that accurate forecasts are not fully translated into portfolio positions (e.g., U.S. mutual funds have traditionally been prevented from taking short positions).

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *